Mounting concerns over U.S. immigration policies have reportedly prompted FIFA to consider relocating portions—or even all—of the 2026 World Cup from the United States to Canada. New visa restrictions affecting citizens from up to 43 countries, including several qualified for the tournament, are drawing backlash from fans, human rights advocates, and global media.

The policies have made it nearly impossible for entire delegations—fans, media, and support staff—from certain countries to enter the U.S., raising fears that some national teams will play in front of empty stands. Iran, for example, will likely have no fan representation due to travel bans, undermining the spirit of global unity central to the tournament.

Critics argue that the situation contradicts FIFA’s own core values of “access and non-discrimination,” as well as its broader commitment to inclusion and human rights. With questions growing over whether the U.S. can host a tournament that lives up to FIFA’s principles, Canada is emerging as a more neutral and logistically viable alternative.

While the U.S. remains a financial powerhouse in the sporting world, Canada’s political stability, inclusiveness, and infrastructure make it an increasingly attractive option for ensuring a successful and truly global World Cup.

FIFA’s final decision could have lasting implications for how it upholds its stated commitments—not just on the field, but off it too.